Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to BrowserTools MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A browser monitoring and interaction tool that enables AI applications to capture and analyze browser data through a Chrome extension, supporting functions like console monitoring, screenshots, DOM analysis, and website auditing.
      14
      22 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This application is a powerful browser monitoring and interaction tool that enables AI-powered applications via Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) to capture and analyze browser data through a Chrome extension.
      7,326
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate web tasks such as browsing, clicking, typing, and taking screenshots via the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides browser automation tools for AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol, enabling tasks like navigation, clicking, filling forms, screenshots, and script execution through natural language.
      39
      -

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap between tools, particularly in the audit category where runAuditMode appears to encompass SEO, accessibility, and performance audits that have separate dedicated tools, creating confusion. However, the console and network tools are more distinct in their focus areas, and descriptions help clarify some boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., getConsoleErrors, runAccessibilityAudit, takeScreenshot), with clear action-oriented names. The main deviation is runAuditMode, which uses a more generic 'Mode' suffix, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 14 tools, the count is reasonable for a browser testing and debugging domain, covering areas like logs, audits, debugging, and screenshots. It's slightly on the higher side but well-scoped for the purpose, with each tool having a defined role in browser interaction.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers key browser operations like logging, auditing, and screenshots, but has notable gaps. For example, there are no tools for navigation (e.g., navigate_to_url, refresh_page) or element interaction (e.g., click_element, input_text), which are essential for comprehensive browser automation, limiting agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues