Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to freshprobe

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      URL reality check for AI agents — returns HTTP status, SHA-256 content hash, classification, readability score, title, and wayback-machine fallback when dead, cached 10 minutes at $0.001 per call.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and CI systems to run deterministic website QA audits over MCP, with every finding backed by evidence and every result hashed and signed. It checks HTTP, TLS, security headers, SEO, links, accessibility, and robots.txt, with configurable pass/fail verdicts.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      URL intelligence for AI agents. One URL in, structured security and data quality signals out across 7 dimensions. 13 tools, risk score 0-100 with 23 configurable weights.
      16
      56 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Dependency health checker for AI agent skills. Analyzes external endpoints for uptime, SSL validity, domain reputation, ownership changes, and abuse scores. Returns a 0-100 trust score per endpoint.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Checks whether a website is readable and citable by AI search engines — llms.txt, Schema.org structured data, AI-bot access in robots.txt, content freshness, answer directness, E-E-A-T signals, plus a LocalBusiness Rich Results validator. Free, no API key, remote Streamable HTTP.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to obtain independent, Ed25519-signed receipts confirming real-world facts: whether a page is online, a domain is legitimate, an email address is deliverable, a heartbeat was declared, or a scheduled task actually ran. Each response includes a verifiable cryptographic receipt, so agents can prove to their users that an asserted outcome was observed by a neutral third party rather than self-attested.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools are mostly distinct: batch probes multiple endpoints, single checks one endpoint in detail, and policy evaluates against thresholds. The slight overlap between batch and single could cause minor confusion, but descriptions clarify the differences well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'freshprobe_' prefix with clear action verbs (batch, check, policy). The naming pattern is predictable and readable, though the prefix is not a standard verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 3 tools, the server is compact and covers the core functionality of probing freshness: single check, batch check, and policy evaluation. The count feels slightly thin but is appropriate for a focused utility server.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers probing, batch probing, and policy evaluation, but lacks management operations like creating/updating policies or listing endpoints. Key workflows are present, but there are notable gaps for a policy-based system.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues