Skip to main content
Glama
Studio-Bereikbaar

SB OGC MCP

Official
by Studio-Bereikbaar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SB OGC MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • osm-mcp

      abangbroy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides live geospatial data such as geocoding, POI search, isochrones, and area density from open data sources to LLM clients like Claude, Cursor, or Claude Code.
      6
      MIT

    • geocontext

      mborne
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An experimental MCP server providing spatial context for LLMs by interfacing with French Geoplateforme services. It enables tasks such as geocoding, altitude lookups, and querying administrative, cadastral, or urban planning data.
      7 npm
      4
      MIT

    • GPT Maps

      SiddharthGoel-07
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables LLMs to create and control interactive MapLibre maps by placing markers, drawing paths, and rendering polygons directly in Claude Desktop.
      1
      -
    • city-data-mcp by zencity-product

      city-data-mcpofficial

      zencity-product
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude deep access to US public data -- demographics, economics, crime, employment, weather, housing, transit, schools, budgets, and more across 30+ cities for government intelligence workflows.
      28
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: collection metadata, data retrieval, thematic mapping, accessibility, modal split, ODIN queries, profiles, spider diagrams, and boundary search. No two tools have overlapping purposes; descriptions clearly differentiate their outputs and inputs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., describe_collection, generate_thematic_map, run_odin_query). The verbs are appropriate for the actions (list, describe, get, run, search), and the pattern is consistent across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    16 tools cover the necessary functionality for a geospatial analysis server without being excessive. The count is well-scoped for discovery, data access, and multiple analysis types.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides a full lifecycle: discover collections/processes, retrieve features, generate thematic maps, and run various analyses (accessibility, modal split, ODIN surveys, spider diagrams). There are no obvious gaps for the intended domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources