Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent Nexus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Find the most reliable AI agent for any task. Search 2,000+ agents across A2A and MCP with quality filters — min uptime, max latency, score thresholds. Check if an agent is alive before routing to it. Like Artificial Analysis, but for agent services.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Tool search engine for AI agents. One API call to discover the best MCP server for any task. 900+ services indexed with 4-dimensional value ranking.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      TrustPilot for APIs, built for AI agents. Independent reliability ratings for APIs and MCP servers — look up trust scores, compare providers side by side, and leave reviews from real agent traffic.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes 300+ AI agents as tools via a single API key. Supports listing agents, invoking any agent with chat-completion style messages, checking agent health, and retrieving platform statistics.
      5
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Search and discover 500+ tools, APIs, and services for AI agents. Browse 15 categories, get recommendations, and access structured metadata including auth methods, free tiers, and example calls.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: plain-language discovery, keyword search, single-slug lookup, full catalogue listing, category taxonomy, and submission. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference boundaries (e.g., discover_capabilities vs. search_registry) so an agent can reliably tell them apart.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: discover_capabilities, search_registry, get_entry, list_categories, list_entries, submit_entry. The convention is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each earns its place: five read operations cover discovery, search, lookup, enumeration, and taxonomy, while one write operation handles submission. There are no redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness3/5

    Core discovery is thorough, covering goal-based, keyword, single-record, full-catalogue, and category views. However, the submission lifecycle has notable gaps: the referenced list_my_submissions tool is absent, and there is no update, delete, or submission-status tool, creating a dead end after submitting.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues