Skip to main content
Glama
Straider2

Protheus Chat MCP Server

by Straider2
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Protheus Chat MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-rag-server

      kwanLeeFrmVi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that indexes documents and serves relevant context to LLMs via Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG).
      28 npm
      36
      MIT

    • RAG Docs MCP Server

      gorizond
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for retrieving and processing documentation through vector search, enabling AI assistants to augment their responses with relevant documentation context.
      24 npm
      MIT
    • doc-search by SodaShikenn

      doc-searchofficial

      SodaShikenn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for hybrid documentation search (keyword + vector) and RAG chat, enabling natural language queries with cited answers from indexed repositories.
      MIT

    • RAG-MCP

      alejandro-ao
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Retrieval Augmented Generation MCP server that ingests documents into a local vector database and enables semantic search queries.
      9
      -

    • mcp-ragdocs

      hannesrudolph
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementation that provides tools for retrieving and processing documentation through vector search, enabling AI assistants to augment their responses with relevant documentation context
      11 npm
      265
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or confusion between different tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool enforces perfect naming consistency; there is no pattern to conflict.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is borderline; for a FAQ knowledge base, a search tool alone may be insufficient for full interaction (e.g., retrieving full answers or browsing categories).

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers search but lacks complementary operations like retrieving detailed results or listing topics, leaving notable gaps for a comprehensive FAQ toolset.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources