Skip to main content
Glama
Store-Experts

SitePerto MCP

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to SitePerto MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents read, analyze, and manage site content, pages, blog posts, and Designer elements through the Data API, connecting either remotely over OAuth or locally with an API token.
      289 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables external AI agents to edit and manage a self-hosted website via a token-gated MCP server, including page content, data, media, and sandboxed functions with validation and rollback.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI design agent to connect to any WordPress site, inspect its real rendered CSS/JS/theme, and create or update pages through the WordPress REST API and optional companion plugin routes.
      6
      30 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and edit WordPress sites over the REST API, including Divi 4, Divi 5, and Gutenberg content, with safety features like round-trip verification, draft-based editing, and dry-run previews.
      45
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a client's own AI to read, edit, and extend their ZAH-built website through MCP, including content, structure, styles, assets, pages, and settings, with versioning, revert, and form/CRM integration, while also giving Zah Editor a real publish flow.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    inspect_site, connection_info, and send_draft target distinct operations: local inspection, project/key metadata lookup, and draft upload. Their boundaries are explicitly stated, with no overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and are readable, but the pattern is not fully uniform: inspect_site and send_draft are verb_noun, while connection_info is noun_noun. This minor deviation keeps naming mostly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools are narrowly scoped to inspecting, checking connection, and sending a draft, so the count is appropriate but minimal. Each tool earns its place, though the set is slightly thin if broader operations are expected.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the stated draft-upload workflow: inspect, verify project link, and send draft. It intentionally omits publish/update/delete because those are user-panel actions, though no draft status or listing operation is provided.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues