Skip to main content
Glama
Store-Experts

SitePerto MCP

Official
by Store-Experts
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to SitePerto MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • wp-mcp-server

      eimon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI design agent to connect to any WordPress site, inspect its real rendered CSS/JS/theme, and create or update pages through the WordPress REST API and optional companion plugin routes.
      6
      16 npm
      MIT

    • wp-ops-mcp

      ad02
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and edit WordPress sites over the REST API, including Divi 4, Divi 5, and Gutenberg content, with safety features like round-trip verification, draft-based editing, and dry-run previews.
      45
      MIT

    • zah-site-mcp

      Yawitazah
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a client's own AI to read, edit, and extend their ZAH-built website through MCP, including content, structure, styles, assets, pages, and settings, with versioning, revert, and form/CRM integration, while also giving Zah Editor a real publish flow.
      -

    • MCP Router

      Kvalifik
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables managing Webflow connections with multiple OAuth grants and per-project permissions, allowing AI tools to access selected projects with configurable read, write, delete, and publish actions.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    inspect_site, connection_info, and send_draft target distinct operations: local inspection, project/key metadata lookup, and draft upload. Their boundaries are explicitly stated, with no overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and are readable, but the pattern is not fully uniform: inspect_site and send_draft are verb_noun, while connection_info is noun_noun. This minor deviation keeps naming mostly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools are narrowly scoped to inspecting, checking connection, and sending a draft, so the count is appropriate but minimal. Each tool earns its place, though the set is slightly thin if broader operations are expected.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the stated draft-upload workflow: inspect, verify project link, and send draft. It intentionally omits publish/update/delete because those are user-panel actions, though no draft status or listing operation is provided.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources