Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to StelaSpace

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first knowledge base MCP server. Lets AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) read and write your personal knowledge base through 20 MCP tools. Zero cloud dependency — all files stay on your machine.
      1,758 npm
      676
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Publishes HTML pages straight from your AI assistant to a shareable URL, then lets you manage them - update, list, search, fetch, and delete pages in a public or private workspace. Turns "share what I just made" into a single tool call from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Deloc — deploy static sites from AI coding agents. Say "deploy this to Deloc" in Claude Code or Cursor and get a live URL back without leaving your editor.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server giving AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code/JetBrains Copilot) a shared, persistent memory of your projects and every bug/issue faced during development. Stateless, plain-file storage (AGENTS.md + issues.jsonl) — no database.
      16
      37 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets AI agents publish markdown/HTML to a browser viewer with session management, revision diffs, and live updates via a single tool call.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: listing documents, listing spaces, and publishing files. There is no overlap between their functionalities.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_documents, list_spaces, and publish_file. The naming is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for a simple document publishing service. The count falls within the ideal 3-15 range, and each tool serves a clear role.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers listing and publishing but lacks essential operations like deleting documents or retrieving a single document's details. These gaps could hinder common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues