Skip to main content
Glama
Stefan-Nitu

mcp-refactor-typescript

by Stefan-Nitu

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-refactor-typescript

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that provides 40 tools for TypeScript/JavaScript refactoring and code intelligence, directly mapping to TypeScript's tsserver protocol commands for accurate structural changes and workspace analysis.
      40
      20 npm
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for automated refactoring of Java and TypeScript/JavaScript codebases.
      16
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides evidence-backed, transactional code refactoring for JavaScript/TypeScript and other languages via MCP, enabling semantic renames, signature changes, edits, and safe bulk operations with preview, atomic apply, and rollback.
      25 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to move TypeScript files and directories while automatically updating all affected imports using a persistent tsserver instance. This ensures atomic, error-free refactoring that maintains project integrity without manual intervention or wasted tokens.
      2
      12 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have mostly distinct purposes: code_quality for fixing errors/organizing, file_operations for file moves, refactoring for symbol renaming/extraction, workspace for finding references and cleanup. Some overlap exists (e.g., workspace cleanup may overlap with code_quality), but descriptions clarify when to use each.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case, but the pattern is inconsistent: code_quality (noun_quality) vs file_operations (noun_operations) vs refactoring (gerund) vs workspace (single noun). No verb_noun pattern, making it less predictable for agents.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the surface is well-scoped for a TypeScript refactoring server. Each tool covers a key area (code quality, file operations, symbol refactoring, workspace queries) without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Core refactoring workflows are covered: error fixing, file renaming, symbol manipulation, and referencing. Minor gaps like formatting or running typechecker are absent, but the set is sufficient for common refactoring tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues