Skip to main content
Glama
StatelyCloud

StatelyDB MCP Server

Official
by StatelyCloud
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to StatelyDB MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Semantic BI MCP

      LovroBubanic
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that gives AI assistants a safe, correct data-analyst capability over business metrics - without raw SQL improvisation.
      -

    • MCP Server Demo

      Drakoxw
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation that can be run directly or through Docker, enabling AI assistants to interact with external systems through the MCP standard.
      2
      -

    • @pilat/mcp-datalink

      pilat
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite that gives AI assistants secure database access via the Model Context Protocol.
      37 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: validating schemas vs migrations, initiating vs verifying login, publishing, and code generation. The two validate tools could be momentarily confused, but their descriptions clearly differentiate schema-level from migration-level validation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'statelydb-' prefix and use hyphenated lowercase, which is readable. Minor deviation: validate/attempt/verify tools use verb_noun ordering while schema-put and schema-generate use noun_verb ordering.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a schema validation, publishing, and code-generation workflow. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The core validate → publish → generate workflow is covered, plus login handling. However, there is no dedicated tool to read/get or delete an existing schema version, and listing access depends on verify-login, leaving notable gaps for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources