Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
resources
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
scan_contractA

Analyze a smart contract's source code or bytecode for known exploit patterns, honeypot mechanics, rug-pull signals, and security vulnerabilities. Returns a risk score (0-100) and detailed findings. Use this BEFORE interacting with any unfamiliar contract.

simulate_transactionA

Simulate a transaction on a forked chain WITHOUT actually executing it. Detects reverts, abnormal gas usage, and other red flags. Use this to preview what will happen before sending a real transaction.

check_tokenA

Check if a token is safe to trade. Detects honeypot mechanics (can't sell), concentrated holdings, fake ownership renouncement, and other scam indicators. Use this before swapping into any unfamiliar token.

assess_riskA

Comprehensive risk assessment combining contract scanning, transaction simulation, and token checks. This is the recommended all-in-one safety check before any DeFi interaction. Returns a go/no-go recommendation.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
aegis-info

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: assess_risk is a comprehensive all-in-one safety check, check_token focuses on token-specific scams, scan_contract analyzes contract code/bytecode, and simulate_transaction previews transaction outcomes. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (assess_risk, check_token, scan_contract, simulate_transaction), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable across the entire set.

Tool Count5/5

With 4 tools, this server is well-scoped for DeFi security. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects of safety assessment: holistic risk, token checks, contract analysis, and transaction simulation. This count is appropriate and avoids bloat.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides complete coverage for DeFi security workflows: it includes comprehensive risk assessment (assess_risk), targeted checks for tokens and contracts, and transaction simulation. There are no obvious gaps—agents can perform end-to-end safety evaluations before any DeFi interaction.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues