Skip to main content
Glama
StanimirTenev

qrp-mcp

by StanimirTenev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to qrp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • quantakrypto pqc-tools

      quantakrypto
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Post-quantum readiness for AI coding agents: scans code for quantum-vulnerable cryptography (RSA/ECDH/ECDSA/DH) and returns NIST ML-KEM/ML-DSA/SLH-DSA (and hybrid) migration guidance, with fix verification and dependency checks. Content-based, advisory tools only; runs local (npx @quantakrypto/mcp) or as a hosted OAuth endpoint.
      16
      11
      Apache 2.0

    • Secure Code Review MCP Server

      Balakonda-reddy
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that scans code for security issues (secrets, dependencies, configurations, risky patterns) and integrates with GitHub Copilot in VS Code for automated pre-commit reviews.
      -

    • MCP Shield

      rob925
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT

    • GhostFree

      shane-js
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that scans repository dependencies for known vulnerabilities (CVEs) using OSV.dev, enriches findings with NVD and CISA KEV data, and supports triage, remediation, and accepted risk management directly from an AI coding assistant.
      6
      19 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct job: list_algorithms is a read-only reference, scan_repo returns a human-readable inventory, export_cbom produces a portable document, and compare_coverage assesses comparability of coverage numbers. The only near-overlap is scan_repo vs export_cbom, but their output formats and use cases are explicitly separated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_algorithms, scan_repo, export_cbom, compare_coverage. The verbs are clear, distinct, and consistently positioned.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for the narrow domain of cryptographic repository scanning and coverage reporting. Each tool earns its place and none feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is covered: understanding detection coverage, scanning a directory, producing a CBOM, and judging whether coverage numbers are comparable. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct way to diff two scans' findings or scan a single file, but these do not block the server's stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources