Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to repo2graph

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP code-intelligence server for AI agents with pre-indexed AST cache, 62 MCP tools, and TOON-compressed output, enabling token-efficient code analysis and project health grading entirely locally.
    9
    949 PyPI
    61
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to query a local-first code intelligence graph of Python repositories—covering functions, classes, modules, and their relationships—via MCP, supporting subgraph retrieval, caller lookup, and impact analysis without re-reading the codebase.
    -
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to query a Python codebase as a knowledge graph over MCP, exposing symbol search plus callers, callees, and module dependency tools.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to query a local, multi-repo code graph for symbol exploration, blast radius analysis, co-change mining, and durable code-anchored memory via MCP tools.
    288 npm
    14
    Business Source 1.1
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI coding agents to navigate and understand entire codebases through symbol-aware semantic retrieval and relational call graph traversal, supporting structural impact analysis and code modification workflows over MCP.
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a sharply distinct purpose, and descriptions explicitly cross-reference alternatives with 'When NOT to use' clauses (e.g., repo_search vs repo_neighbours vs repo_map). Even the three graph-traversal tools (neighbours, blast_radius, path_between) are cleanly separated by scope (one-hop, reverse-reachability, bounded path).

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share a consistent `repo_` prefix and snake_case form, which is highly predictable. There is minor stylistic drift between verb-led names (repo_search, repo_read, repo_find_symbol) and noun-led names (repo_map, repo_neighbours, repo_path_between), but this stays readable and conventional.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools is well-scoped for a read-only code-graph navigation server, with each tool earning its place across discovery, traversal, reading, and diagnostics. No redundant or filler tools are present.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers discovery (map, search, find_symbol), inspection (read, neighbours), and impact analysis (blast_radius, path_between) plus operational status. Minor gaps exist, such as explicit file/directory listing, but core read-only navigation workflows are well covered.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week