CXA MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to CXA MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze public web pages for speed, Core Web Vitals, Lighthouse categories, accessibility and SEO scores, and resource optimization opportunities through a remote MCP connection.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to monitor website performance by scanning sites, retrieving Core Web Vitals, detecting regressions, and receiving AI-powered optimization recommendations.11185 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to retrieve lab performance scores and field Core Web Vitals data for web pages via Google APIs.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables running Lighthouse web performance audits via MCP, providing Core Web Vitals, performance scores, and optimization suggestions for single or multiple URLs.22,388 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceCore Web Vitals analysis powered by Lighthouse. Four tools: analyze a URL, compare two URLs, check against thresholds, or crawl an entire site. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool.49 npmMIT

QAJev MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to crawl websites, run plain-language goal-based checks, read reports and screenshots, and follow or stop runs through MCP.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is no risk of selecting the wrong tool or confusing it with another operation. Its purpose is clearly stated as a performance-only scan.
The single tool name cxa_scan_performance uses a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern consistent with MCP naming conventions. With no other tools, there is no inconsistency to assess.
A single tool feels thin for a server surface, even though the scope is narrowly defined as performance scanning. It borders on under-scoped but is defensible for a very specific, single-purpose scanner.
The tool covers performance measurement across multiple browser/device profiles and returns a rich dashboard, matching the stated performance-only scope. Minor gaps exist around configuration, historical comparison, or export options, but core performance scanning is complete.