Skip to main content
Glama
Sravan-Mekala-1999-cognizant

CXA MCP Server

by Sravan-Mekala-1999-cognizant
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CXA MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LightScout MCP

      bobbyrgoldsmith
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Core Web Vitals analysis powered by Lighthouse. Four tools: analyze a URL, compare two URLs, check against thresholds, or crawl an entire site. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool.
      4
      9 npm
      MIT

    • pagespeed-insights-mcp

      damijanc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server integrates Google PageSpeed Insights to analyze website performance, accessibility, best practices, SEO, and PWA on mobile and desktop, returning detailed audits and optimization opportunities.
      MIT

    • Lighthouse MCP

      danielsogl
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web audits using Google Lighthouse with 13+ tools for performance, accessibility, SEO, and security analysis.
      11
      964 npm
      71
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no risk of selecting the wrong tool or confusing it with another operation. Its purpose is clearly stated as a performance-only scan.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name cxa_scan_performance uses a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern consistent with MCP naming conventions. With no other tools, there is no inconsistency to assess.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool feels thin for a server surface, even though the scope is narrowly defined as performance scanning. It borders on under-scoped but is defensible for a very specific, single-purpose scanner.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers performance measurement across multiple browser/device profiles and returns a rich dashboard, matching the stated performance-only scope. Minor gaps exist around configuration, historical comparison, or export options, but core performance scanning is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources