forgejo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to forgejo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides Claude Desktop with tools to interact with Forgejo repositories, including listing repos, issues, and reading files.810GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server and dashboard that provides governed, auditable AI access to a Forgejo instance, with tools for managing repositories, issues, pull requests, and more.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to read, create, and manage issues, repositories, and releases on Gitea, Forgejo, or Codeberg instances via personal access tokens.21133 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for GitHub operations. It enables AI assistants to interact with GitHub repositories through a standardized interface.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to perform GitHub operations including repository management, file operations, issue tracking, and pull request creation.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with GitHub repositories, issues, and pull requests.10 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 103 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose targeting a specific resource and action. Despite the large number, descriptions are sufficiently detailed to differentiate between similar operations (e.g., list_org_repos vs list_user_repos).
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_branch, list_issues, edit_repo). The naming convention is uniform across all 103 tools, with no mixing of styles.
103 tools is excessive for any MCP server, even a comprehensive one like Forgejo. This volume can overwhelm agents and makes navigation difficult. Many admin-specific tools could be grouped or reduced.
Covers most CRUD operations for users, repos, issues, PRs, orgs, teams, labels, milestones, releases, files, branches, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no delete_team or remove_org_member), but overall the surface is comprehensive.