Skip to main content
Glama
microCMS MCP Server

microCMS MCP Server

by SpringMT

microCMS MCP Server

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) compatible microCMS search server that can be used to search and retrieve microCMS content from LLM.

function

  • Searching for content using the microCMS API

  • Getting specific content

  • MCP (Model Context Protocol) compliant interface

Related MCP server: @lex-tools/codebase-context-dumper

Description of required environment variables

  • MICROCMS_API_KEY : microCMS API key (required)

  • MICROCMS_SERVICE_DOMAIN : microCMS service domain (required)

  • MICROCMS_ENDPOINT : The endpoint to use.

Build

npm run build

How to use

Usage from MCP client

This server complies with the MCP protocol and can therefore be called by any MCP-enabled LLM client.

{
    "mcpServers": {
        "microcms": {
            "command": "node",
            "args": [
                "/ABSOLUTE/PATH/TO/PARENT/FOLDER/build/index.js"
            ],
            "env": {
                "MICROCMS_API_KEY": "",
                "MICROCMS_SERVICE_DOMAIN": "",
                "MICROCMS_ENDPOINT": ""
            }
        }
    }
}

Available Tools

2 tools
GetMicroCMSContentC

Get specific content from MicroCMS by ID

Inputs: endpoint (required), contentId (required), fields, depth.

SearchMicroCMSC

Search content in MicroCMS

Inputs: q (required), limit, offset, fields, +2 more.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: GetMicroCMSContent retrieves a specific item by ID, while SearchMicroCMS performs a broader query across content. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the right tool for the task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent naming pattern with a verb (Get or Search) followed by the domain (MicroCMS) and a noun (Content). They use consistent PascalCase styling, making the naming predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a content management system. It lacks essential CRUD operations like create, update, or delete, which are typically expected for managing content. The count is too low for the apparent domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete for a CMS server. It only provides read operations (get and search), missing create, update, delete, and other lifecycle management functions. This will cause agent failures when full content management is required.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers