echart-mcp-view
Related Servers
Alternatives to echart-mcp-view
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for data visualization. It exposes tools to render charts (line, bar, pie, scatter, heatmap, etc.) from data and returns plots as either image/text/mermaid diagram.24MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that enables LLMs to generate ECharts visualizations by accepting chart type, data and parameters and returning cloud image URLs of the generated charts.11 npm84Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that renders bar, line, and pie charts from data using QuickChart, returning PNG file paths.114 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for creating interactive Vega-Lite data visualizations that render inline in chat via MCP Apps.21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP ECharts is a dynamic chart generation and data analysis tool based on Apache ECharts, supporting multiple export formats and MinIO object storage integration.2Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for generating offline charts using Apache ECharts SVG SSR and rsvg-convert, optimized for Kylin ARM64 with 64KB page size.-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a specific chart type or utility function, with no overlap. The 16 open tools each correspond to a distinct visualization, and the two app helpers serve unique roles.
All tools follow the pattern 'echart_mcp_view_', with most using 'open_<charttype>'. Two app-specific tools use 'app_' instead of 'open_', which is a minor deviation but still consistent within their category.
18 tools cover a broad range of chart types and two utility functions, which is well-scoped for a visualization server. No tool is superfluous, and the number matches the domain well.
The set includes major chart types (bar, line, pie, scatter, radar, etc.) and unique ones like boxplot and candlestick. Missing some less common types (e.g., area map, histogram), but coverage is strong for most use cases.