Skip to main content
Glama
SpeedosDK

predictive-debugger

by SpeedosDK
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to predictive-debugger

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Debugging MCP Server

      luischang07
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to automatically diagnose coding errors through codebase search, test execution, and live debugger integration (DAP/V8 CDP). Provides a secure, policy-gated environment for investigating failures while preventing destructive operations.
      9
      -

    • lurq

      jadenryu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to verify, compare, and safely upgrade npm packages by scoring packages from public signals and sandboxed co-installation, detecting breaking API surface changes, and rewriting code that upgrades break.
      188 npm
      8
      MIT

    • flowindex

      adu3110
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to analyze codebase behavior through entrypoints, call paths, and tests, providing impact analysis and context packs for code changes.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct scopes: dependencies, single-file metrics, project-wide ranking, log anomaly detection, provider diagnostics, and model-backed failure prediction. The only minor overlap is between analyze_file and scan_project (both assess risk, but at different granularities) and predict_failures (which uses a model for verdicts).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All six tools follow the same verb_noun snake_case pattern: map_dependencies, analyze_file, list_providers, scan_project, analyze_logs, predict_failures. No mixed conventions, aliases, or inconsistent verb choices.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped size for a predictive debugger. Each tool covers a distinct part of the workflow (dependency mapping, file analysis, project scanning, log analysis, provider setup, and failure prediction) without bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full predictive debugging workflow: scan to find risky files, analyze individual file risk, map dependencies for context, read logs for runtime anomalies, and get model-backed failure predictions. Minor gaps exist—no tool to directly inspect test coverage or historical failures—but these are workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources