Skip to main content
Glama
Spaceship-AI

Spaceship MCP

by Spaceship-AI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Spaceship MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SpaceTraders MCP Server

      TheValverde
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with the SpaceTraders API, managing agents, fleets, contracts, and trading operations in the SpaceTraders universe.
      MIT

    • anchor-mcp

      thewillmoss
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A portable MCP server that provides a shared persistent working state for AI coding agents, managing tasks, plans, notepads, memory, and project rules across different tools like Claude Code, OpenCode, and Cursor.
      6
      4 npm
      MIT

    • MCP Plus

      David3u
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that enhances AI agents with tools for codebase analysis, task delegation to sub-agents, multi-agent coordination through chatrooms, and project todo management.
      -

    • Orchestration MCP

      dufangshi
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A TypeScript MCP server for launching, tracking, and managing external coding-agent runs across local and remote backends like Codex and Claude Code. It allows top-level agents to orchestrate subagents through tools for spawning tasks, polling events, and handling interactive sessions.
      7
      2
      -

    • cursor-mcp-server

      bbarney7
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server wrapping the Cursor CLI agent, enabling Claude Code and other MCP clients to delegate tasks to Cursor's AI agent for file writing, bash commands, and codebase queries.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All tools have clearly distinct purposes: create vs delete vs get vs list for agents, orchestrations, etc. Even similar tools like get_run_logs and get_run_status target different aspects of runs (logs vs status). test_agent and run_agent differ in synchronous vs asynchronous execution. No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names consistently follow the verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., create_agent, get_run_status, list_projects). No mixing of camelCase or other styles. Very predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    16 tools is appropriate for a platform managing agents and orchestrations. It covers essential operations without being overwhelming. Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers agent lifecycle (CRUD), run management (run, test, status, logs), orchestration operations (list, get, run, test), and listing of projects/tools. Missing delete/update for orchestrations and projects, but those may be out of scope. Minor gaps, but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources