Get Forecast
getForecastRetrieve a weather forecast for any city. Provides temperature, conditions, and more.
Instructions
Get a weather forecast for a city
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | Yes | The city name |
getForecastRetrieve a weather forecast for any city. Provides temperature, conditions, and more.
Get a weather forecast for a city
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | Yes | The city name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description provides no behavioral context such as read-only nature, required permissions, or output format. For a forecast tool, details like time range or data units would be helpful.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no extraneous words. It efficiently conveys the basic purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description is too minimal. It lacks information about what the forecast includes (e.g., temperature, precipitation) and how it differs from getCurrentWeather.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the 'city' parameter description 'The city name' is adequate. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get a weather forecast for a city', which matches the tool name and indicates a specific resource. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like getCurrentWeather, which could also involve weather data.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus its siblings (getAirQuality, getCurrentWeather). The agent is left to infer the difference from the tool name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Sousam2002/weather-location-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server