createWorkspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions the creation behavior and important constraints, but lacks details on what the tool returns (e.g., workspace ID) and error handling. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the burden, but it is partially adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, front-loaded with the main purpose, and every sentence adds value without any unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers creation purpose and key constraints, but lacks information about required fields (is name required?), success output, and error scenarios. Given the nested object parameter and no output schema, it is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the workspace parameter with a description. The tool's description adds context about type constraints and the optional teamId field, but the teamId is not in the schema, causing slight inconsistency. Overall, it adds some meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Creates a new workspace', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like updateWorkspace and getWorkspaces, as it is the only creation tool for workspaces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool by specifying constraints: Private/Partner workspaces require Team/Enterprise, public names must be unique, and teamId should be passed if Organizations is enabled. It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but that is implied by the existence of updateWorkspace.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.