reset_display

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide no safety profile (all hints false), so the description carries the full burden. It says the display is reset but does not disclose whether this affects only the view state, whether it is reversible, or whether it changes visibility/selection settings. A view/reset tool could reasonably be read-only, but the description does not confirm this.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with a helpful parenthetical clarification. It is appropriately short for a zero-parameter utility, though slightly under-specified in behavioral terms.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-param, no-output-schema tool, the description is mostly sufficient: an agent can infer the basic action. However, it omits usage context and does not clarify whether this is a pure view-state change or a broader display reset, leaving some ambiguity for correct invocation in a large sibling set.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. There is no parameter information needed in the description beyond acknowledging the operation requires no input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Reset display view', and the Chinese gloss clarifies it restores the default display or shows everything. This distinguishes it from related display tools like display_ids, set_view_angle, and set_render, though it does not explicitly name them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as set_view_angle, set_render, or switch_display_stage. The intended use is only implied by the name and description, with no exclusions or alternative conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.