A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceProvides AI content watermarking and C2PA compliance for EU AI Act Article 50, enabling detection, verification, and batch processing of authenticated content.
1 npm
30 PyPI
MIT
EU AI Act Compliance MCP Server
by SonnyLabs
Related Servers
Alternatives to EU AI Act Compliance MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI governance and EU AI Act compliance through a council of 12 AIs, enabling risk management, transparency, bias detection, and content watermarking.121MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides 62 AI governance tools for compliance with regulations like the EU AI Act, enabling risk management, transparency, bias detection, and more.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables EU AI Act compliance for AI agent systems by providing risk classification, audit trails, gap analysis, and evidence package generation.36 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceScans codebases for AI frameworks, checks EU AI Act compliance, and generates compliance reports, roadmaps, and audit-ready packages.1611MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AML/6AMLD compliance for AI systems, including obliged entity classification, KYC/CDD audits, and sanctions screening.38 PyPIMIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct compliance concern: retrieval of templates, disclosures for interaction/emotion, labeling vs watermarking for different content types, risk classification, prohibited practice checking, role determination, and security scanning. No two tools have overlapping purposes; the descriptions clearly differentiate human-readable labels from machine-readable watermarks and different compliance articles.
Naming Consistency4/5
The tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_* for retrieval, label_* for disclosure generation, watermark_* for metadata generation, and specific verbs like classify, check, determine, scan. Minor deviation: label_news_text vs label_image_deepfake (news text vs deepfake modality), but overall the naming is predictable and systematic.
Tool Count4/5
With 16 tools, the server covers a broad but well-defined domain of EU AI Act compliance. The count is slightly at the upper boundary but each tool serves a distinct content type or compliance article, so it doesn't feel bloated.
Completeness4/5
The server provides comprehensive coverage for the EU AI Act's transparency obligations (labels, watermarks), risk classification, prohibited practices, role determination, and security checks. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated GPAI obligations tool), but core compliance workflows are fully covered.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive