Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
SongPilot MCP Server

SongPilot MCP Server

Official
by SongPilotAI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SongPilot MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Portal MCP Server

      BlackMatter-Studios
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to connect their music distribution catalog and streaming analytics to Claude Desktop, Cursor IDE, and ChatGPT for querying stream trends, inspecting catalog compliance, and applying safe draft release fixes via natural language.
      22 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • spotify-mcp

      Stipe15
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to manage Spotify playlists and analyze personal listening history, including account reads, playlist writes, local analytics from data exports, and building playlists from track lists.
      35
      MIT

    • Spotify MCP Server

      MadhurToshniwal
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates Spotify with Claude to enable voice-controlled music playback, playlist management, and personalized recommendations through conversational AI. It provides comprehensive tools for searching tracks, managing liked songs, and analyzing listening habits.
      15
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of an agent confusing it with another tool. Its purpose (routing natural-language requests to SongPilot specialists) is unambiguous by construction.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The lone name 'run_orchestrator' follows a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern. With a single tool, consistency is trivially satisfied and the name is readable and descriptive.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single catch-all tool is very thin for the apparent breadth of the domain (artwork, release planning, bios, song status, artist profiles). The router pattern is deliberate, but agents get no discoverable capability surface beyond one opaque entry point.

    Completeness2/5

    There are no structured operations for core entities like songs, albums, artists, or releases — no list/get/create/update equivalents. Everything must go through free-text routing, so agents cannot perform predictable, verifiable actions and will fail on tasks requiring structured access.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources