Proton Suite Agent
Related Servers
Alternatives to Proton Suite Agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents access to ProtonMail via Proton Bridge, enabling secure search, read, draft, and send of emails while keeping decrypted mail local.8117 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to ProtonMail via Bridge, enabling AI assistants like Claude to manage your email.3-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to read and search Proton Mail messages through a locally running Proton Mail Bridge. It provides tools like list_folders, list_messages, search_messages, get_message, and get_attachment.610 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents permission-gated, audit-logged access to private email providers (Proton Mail via Bridge and plain IMAP), running locally with OAuth-based authentication and human-controlled escalation for destructive operations.66167 npm11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Proton privacy suite — Mail, Pass, Drive, Calendar, and VPN. 36 tools for Claude and other MCP-compatible AI agents.20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server that unifies email and calendar management across multiple providers, enabling AI agents to search, read, and write with explicit approval and local-first security.1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Within each product many tools are distinct, but the suite has multiple overlapping diagnostic/status tools: proton_bridge_status, proton_bridge_health, proton_bridge_info, proton_suite_status, proton_ecosystem_health, and multiple drive status/auth tools. Descriptions help, but an agent can still struggle to choose the right health/status/info tool.
All tool names use lower snake_case with a consistent proton_ prefix, and product-specific tools follow predictable proton_<product>_<action> patterns. The mail tools omit an explicit mail namespace, but their action names are still clear and consistent.
39 tools is excessive for a single MCP server, even one covering Mail, Drive, Bridge, and ecosystem diagnostics. While each product subgroup is individually scoped, the total surface creates substantial selection burden.
Core email and drive lifecycle operations are well covered: folder management, read/search/send/reply/forward/flag/move/delete, attachments, upload/download/copy/move/remove/share, and bridge/ecosystem diagnostics. Minor gaps exist around draft management, drive rename/search, and actual bridge process control.