Proton Suite Agent
Related Servers
Alternatives to Proton Suite Agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents access to ProtonMail via Proton Bridge, enabling secure search, read, draft, and send of emails while keeping decrypted mail local.830 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to ProtonMail via Bridge, enabling AI assistants like Claude to manage your email.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to read and search Proton Mail messages through a locally running Proton Mail Bridge. It provides tools like list_folders, list_messages, search_messages, get_message, and get_attachment.29403 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents permission-gated, audit-logged access to private email providers (Proton Mail via Bridge and plain IMAP), running locally with OAuth-based authentication and human-controlled escalation for destructive operations.6660 npm17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Proton privacy suite — Mail, Pass, Drive, Calendar, and VPN. 36 tools for Claude and other MCP-compatible AI agents.27MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server that unifies email and calendar management across multiple providers, enabling AI agents to search, read, and write with explicit approval and local-first security.2Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Core mail and Drive actions are mostly distinct, but the set has several overlapping status/health tools: proton_ecosystem_health vs proton_suite_status, proton_bridge_health vs proton_bridge_status vs proton_bridge_info, and proton_drive_auth_status vs proton_drive_status. Descriptions clarify scope, but an agent can still hesitate over which status check to call.
Tools consistently use the proton_ prefix and snake_case, generally following a proton_<domain>_<action>_<object> pattern. Minor deviations like proton_bridge_accounts (noun-only) and mixed domain labels (ecosystem/suite/bridge) are readable but slightly less predictable.
39 tools is heavy for a single server, even one spanning mail, Drive, Bridge, and ecosystem administration. Many health/auth/status variants could be consolidated, and the large surface increases selection burden.
Mail and Drive lifecycles are broadly covered: listing, reading, sending, replying, forwarding, flagging, moving, deleting, attachments, uploads, downloads, sharing, auditing, and organizing. There are minor gaps such as no folder rename/delete for mail and limited Drive path rename/search, but core workflows are supported.