Skip to main content
Glama
claucloverleaf

claucloverleaf

by SolthaX

overleaf_read_file

Read-only

Reads live content from a specified Overleaf project file, with optional line ranges and numbering, so you can inspect exact document sections before editing.

Instructions

Read a text document's live content.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "project": "<project>",
      "path": "<path>"
    },
    "name": "overleaf_read_file"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesPath in the project, e.g. 'main.tex' or 'chapters/intro.tex'.
projectYesProject id, Overleaf project URL, or exact project name.
end_lineNoLast line to return (inclusive).
start_lineNoFirst line to return (1-based).
line_numbersNoPrefix each line with its number.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true. The description adds that content is 'live' and limited to a 'text document,' hinting at real-time retrieval and file-type constraints, but omits permissions, error behavior, and binary-handling details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is arguably under-specified for a tool with optional ranged reads, but that detail is handled in the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and annotations cover the safety profile, so return format and read-only nature need not be explained. The 'text document' and 'live content' constraints give enough context for invocation, though selection guidance is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with path, project, line-range, and line-number parameters fully documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Read') and resource ('text document') with 'live content' clarifying that it fetches current content. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from siblings like overleaf_list_files or overleaf_download_pdf, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus overleaf_list_files, overleaf_download_pdf, or the write/editing siblings. The only implied usage is the tautological act of reading a file's content.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.