Skip to main content
Glama
SohailShabbir867

High-Performance File System MCP Server

by SohailShabbir867
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to High-Performance File System MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • local-mcp

      fan-67
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight, stdio-based MCP server enabling AI assistants to perform local file system operations like reading, writing, searching, and executing commands.
      3,443
      MIT

    • local-drive-mcp

      sofakingmc0804
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling ChatGPT to interact with local filesystem via controlled file operations like read, write, edit, and search, with configurable guardrails for safety.
      MIT

    • json-md-studio

      kongtou-1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables AI agents to securely read, write, search, and edit JSON and Markdown files through a gated permission-scoped interface with configurable access modes.
      MIT

    • File MCP Server

      d-issy
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to perform comprehensive file operations including finding, reading, writing, editing, searching, moving, and copying files with security validations.
      7
      1
      -

    • localllm-MCP

      tsxk1san
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to read, search, and edit local files securely without external data exposure, using local LLMs via Ollama and integrating with Open WebUI or Claude Desktop.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: read vs. read_multiple, write vs. edit, file vs. directory actions. get_file_info and list_directory might seem similar, but descriptions clarify that one returns metadata for a single path while the other lists directory contents.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (read_file, write_file, delete_file, create_directory). Minor deviations include read_multiple_files (verb_phrase) and get_file_info (uses 'get' instead of 'read'), but the overall convention is consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a file system MCP server. Each tool covers a necessary file or directory operation without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core lifecycle operations for files and directories: create, read, update, delete, list, move, and search. A notable gap is the lack of a copy operation, but move_file and edit_file cover most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources