nadbounty-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to nadbounty-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create identities, list and find services, handle payments in USDC, and manage reputation through a decentralized marketplace.6 npm1MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading live market state on Arc (chainId 5042) including launchpads, LP APRs, RPC consensus, token screens, honeypot simulations, and an agent directory.1214 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to find and query real-time GitHub coding bounties with built-in scam filtering, supporting listing, matching, and detailed bounty retrieval.426 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLets agents query anchored ground-level capture data, verify provenance, and commission new captures, paying per request in USDC on Base or Arc via x402.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents and terminal users to discover Solana Gibwork bounties, inspect deliverable requirements, verify on-chain escrow and token mints, and scaffold local development workspaces.4MIT

work2own-mcpofficial
AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and complete quests and gigs, submit proof, and receive rewards in stock tokens or USDG. It also lets agents create and fund work, hire applicants, review submissions, and pay.23MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resources/actions (bounties, contests, identities, keys, balances, network). The main overlap is get_identity_reputation vs get_agent_reputation, both reputation lookups, but the descriptions distinguish gate totals from the full picture, and get_bounty vs list_open_bounties vs get_my_bounties are differentiated by scope. Only minor confusion is likely.
The set mostly follows a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_open_bounties, get_bounty, get_contest, generate_contest_keypair, encrypt_contest_entry, decrypt_contest_entry). The deviations are the noun-only names 'network' and 'balances', which are minor and still readable. Overall consistent with one or two stylistic exceptions.
13 tools is a reasonable, well-scoped number for a bounty/contest domain and none feel redundant. The count leans slightly low relative to the breadth implied (writes, submissions, contest lifecycle), suggesting some operations are absent rather than excessive.
The surface is largely read + crypto (list/get/balances/identity/reputation/encrypt/decrypt) but the descriptions repeatedly reference mutation tools that are not present (post_bounty, enter_contest, approve_bounty, submit delivery, pin_text, respond/claim). Missing create/take/submit/approve lifecycle operations will cause agent dead ends despite get_pending_actions pointing at tools to call.