FreightUtils MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to FreightUtils MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and manage logistics shipment data, supporting operations like tracking, quoting, and performance analysis via nine tools backed by a demo dataset or a REST API.9253 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOcean container shipping intelligence for AI agents — D\&D tariffs, freight rates, vessel schedules, port congestion, inland haulage across 6 major carriers. 24 MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables optimal freight-mode selection (air, sea-LCL, full container) by solving 3D bin-packing, cost optimization, and delivery-risk analysis behind two tools: solve for deterministic planning and explain for hallucination-proof natural-language narration of results.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides container shipping intelligence for AI agents, enabling demurrage & detention calculations, local charges, inland haulage rates, and CFS tariffs across multiple shipping lines, with pay-per-request USDC payments via x402.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform international trade operations such as calculating landed costs, classifying goods, explaining trade terms, estimating shipping, and converting currencies for Kazakhstan/EAEU/Central Asia trade routes.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to pack trucks and shipping containers by generating validated 3D load plans with metrics like LDM, linear feet, and pallet positions through the Hansatic packing API.37 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct domains and purposes, and descriptions extensively cross-reference related tools. However, there are borderline overlaps such as consignment_calculator vs shipment_summary, the trio of ADR tools, and validate vs resolve_reference, which could occasionally cause misselection. Boundaries are generally well documented, so ambiguity is minor.
All names use snake_case consistently and are highly readable, with most following a noun_calculator or noun_lookup pattern. A few tools deviate by starting with a verb (validate, resolve_reference, get_subscribe_link) or using a different structure (shipment_summary, ics2_check), but these are minor deviations within an otherwise predictable naming scheme.
At 25 tools, the server sits at the upper end of the recommended 3-15 range and feels heavy even for a broad freight-utilities domain. While each tool covers a distinguishable subdomain (calculations, lookups, validation, ADR, customs, conversions), the count risks overwhelming an agent and could benefit from consolidation or clearer grouping.
The surface covers a wide range of freight utilities: core weight/volume/LDM calculations, equipment and location lookups, Incoterms, HS codes, ADR checks, UK duty estimation, emissions, and identifier validation/resolution. Minor gaps remain, such as non-UK duty estimation, booking/tracking operations, and document generation, but these are outside the apparent scope of a utility/reference server and agents can work around them.