decision_council_review

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions adversarial perspectives and complexity activation, omitting behavioral details like side effects, state changes, or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with front-loaded trigger statement and terse args list; every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given output schema exists and parameter descriptions are provided, description covers core usage; lacks behavioral context but is otherwise sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Description provides meaningful definitions for all 3 parameters beyond schema names (e.g., 'complexity: 1-5, higher = more perspectives'), compensating for 0% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states tool is for high-stakes decisions (architecture, security, etc.) and runs them through 5 adversarial perspectives, clearly differentiating from sibling analysis tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly defines trigger condition ('HIGH-STAKES decision') and domains, but does not provide explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.