CDT AutoCAD Provider
Related Servers
Alternatives to CDT AutoCAD Provider
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to connect to and automate AutoCAD on Windows via COM, exposing tools to inspect drawings and layers, create geometry and text, manage system variables, run commands, and save or open drawings. Requires full AutoCAD running with a drawing open.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to create and edit technical drawings, manage layers and geometry, process GIS/research mapping data, generate previews and layouts, and automate AutoCAD documents on Windows through COM.225578 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to drive AutoCAD LT or headless DXF generation through natural-language requests, exposing consolidated tools for drawings, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID symbols, viewport screenshots, and AutoLISP execution.1MIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceNatural-language MCP bridge for AutoCAD 2024. Enables users to inspect and edit DWG drawings, manage layers, entities, layouts, styles, and system variables; draw 2D geometry and 3D solids; perform measurements and transactional edits; and export to DWG, STL, PDF, DWF, SVG, or raster formats through a local named-pipe connection.211-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables automation of AutoCAD LT and headless DXF creation through two backends (File IPC for Windows AutoCAD LT and ezdxf for cross-platform) with tools for drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, PID, view, and system operations.813MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants such as Claude Desktop or Cursor to control supported CAD applications through natural language and unified MCP tools for drawing, layers, blocks, entities, files, and exports. Supports AutoCAD, ZWCAD, GstarCAD, and BricsCAD via Windows COM.-
TDQS
Scored across 87 tools
Most tools have distinct resource/action scopes, and descriptions include explicit cross-references for close neighbors such as document_save vs document_save_as and xref_unload vs xref_detach. Some overlap remains between generic object transforms, solid_transform, batch_transform_entities, and feature_execute vs transaction tools, so an agent still needs careful selection.
Tools are overwhelmingly snake_case with resource-first naming such as object_move, layer_create, and solid_boolean, which is predictable across major groups. Minor deviations like help/undo/redo and mixed action ordering in names such as native_integrity_status or drawing_extents keep it from perfect consistency.
87 tools is far above the recommended 3-15 range and crosses the 50+ extreme-mismatch threshold. Although the tools are largely non-redundant, the surface is too large for efficient agent selection and would benefit from consolidation into higher-level operations.
The surface covers document lifecycle, layers, blocks, xrefs, layouts, viewports, objects, entity creation, dimensions, solids, metadata, transactions, and undo/redo, so core AutoCAD workflows are well covered. Gaps remain for deleting layers/blocks/layouts, closing documents, block attributes, and several common entity types, but agents can mostly work around them.