Skip to main content
Glama
Slimouzi

ifc-geometry-mcp

by Slimouzi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ifc-geometry-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • bim-agent

      Daviidro
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables one-click BIM audits by chaining IFC statistics, validation, and quantity takeoff workflows through natural language queries.
      MIT

    • ifcopenshell-mcp

      Daviidro
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets users query, validate, convert, and compare IFC/BIM files using natural language. Runs fully locally and integrates with AI agents like Claude.
      8
      MIT

    • bim2sim-mcp

      l4b4r4b4b4
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for BIM-to-building-energy simulation workflows with IFC extraction, TEASER integration, scenario modeling, weather binding, and results export for downstream WAT/ROI analysis.
      11
      MIT

    • Adlor MCP CAD

      MErblin
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An open-source MCP server that bridges AI agents to Autodesk Revit and IFC geometry, providing ASME B31.3 pipe thickness verification, UK HSE Legionella compliance auditing, and 3D BIM property inspection.
      1
      -

    • CityDPC-MCP

      HamerCode
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for inspecting, analysing, and editing CityJSON and CityGML building datasets.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a unique aspect of IFC geometry analysis: boundaries, inventory, clashes, surface loss, openings, and envelope. No two tools have overlapping purposes, and descriptions clearly differentiate their outputs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_, extract_, run_, compute_, check_, extract_), with clear action words and specific object nouns. This predictable structure makes it easy to infer tool behavior.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for its domain. Each tool covers a distinct geometry analysis function, and the number feels neither too thin nor overwhelming.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle of space quality assessment: boundary verification, inventory extraction, clash detection, surface loss computation, opening matching, and envelope extraction. No glaring gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources