Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to UofT Timetable Builder MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first Rutgers course planning assistant that answers 'what should I take and when?' using a CP-SAT solver, real transcript data, and live SOC data, connected to Claude via MCP.
      13
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying the public UCLA Schedule of Classes. It provides tools to list terms, subject areas, search courses, and get detailed enrollment, waitlist, and section information.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Remote MCP connector providing live, structured access to CMU Courses public data including courses, prerequisites, schedules, instructors, gen-eds, and final-exam times to help students plan schedules.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Unofficial MCP tools for LettuceMeet to create polls, view responses, and find meeting overlaps via CLI or MCP server.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with the Crewmeister API over local stdio, covering operations for members, teams, time tracking, salary exports, and related platform resources.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: authentication flow (login, auth_status, forget_session), discovery (discover), read operations (read, result), and saving (save_timetable). Minor overlap between 'read' and 'result' as both handle retrieval, but result is specifically for snapshot paging, so it's acceptable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a 'uoft_' prefix with verb or noun, but 'save_timetable' breaks the pattern. Verbs are inconsistent (login, discover, read, forget_session) vs nouns (auth_status, result). Still readable, but not a uniform convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a clear purpose: authentication management, discovery, reading, result handling, and saving. No redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers authentication, discovery, reading, and saving timetable states, but lacks explicit tools for creating or modifying timetables (only saves a provided state). This may require agents to construct states themselves, a notable gap for a 'Timetable Builder' server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues