Skip to main content
Glama
SleepingTalent

forex-predict-mcp

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
logging
{}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
extensions
{
  "io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_market_featuresA

Fetch and compute the feature vector for a forex pair.

ticker: 'EURUSD=X' or 'GBPUSD=X'

Returns {ticker, as_of, features: {feature_name: value}} on success, or {error: reason} if the ticker is unsupported or data cannot be fetched. Call this first, inspect the features, then pass them to get_forex_signal.

get_forex_signalA

Run the XGBoost model with pre-computed features from get_market_features.

ticker: 'EURUSD=X' or 'GBPUSD=X' features: the features dict returned by get_market_features()

Returns {ticker, as_of, signal (UP/DOWN), prob_up, confidence} on success, or {error: reason} if features are missing or the ticker is unsupported.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct roles: one fetches and computes market features, the other consumes those features to produce a signal. There is no ambiguity about which tool to call for a given step.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow the same verb_noun pattern (get_market_features, get_forex_signal), making the naming predictable and consistent.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the set is minimal but appropriate for a focused prediction pipeline. It feels thin for a broader domain, but for the stated purpose of feature extraction plus signal generation, it is acceptable.

Completeness4/5

The tools cover the core workflow: fetch features, then run the model. There is no missing operation for the primary use case, though additional tools like backtesting or historical data retrieval would enhance completeness.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues