Skip to main content
Glama
SlanyCukr

Bug Bounty MCP Server

by SlanyCukr

smart_scan

Execute AI-driven security scans with parallel tool selection to identify vulnerabilities on specified targets using configurable objectives.

Instructions

Execute intelligent scan using AI-driven tool selection with parallel execution.

Args: target: Target domain, IP, or URL objective: Scan objective (comprehensive, fast, stealth, targeted)

Returns: Smart scan results with AI-optimized execution

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
objectiveNocomprehensive
targetYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • MCP tool handler for 'smart_scan'. Proxies POST request to REST API /api/intelligence/smart-scan endpoint with target and objective parameters. Handles logging and returns the API response.
    def smart_scan(target: str, objective: str = "comprehensive") -> dict[str, Any]:
        """Run AI-driven smart scan with parallel execution.
    
        Args:
            target: Target domain, IP, or URL
            objective: Scan objective (comprehensive, fast, stealth, targeted)
    
        Returns:
            Smart scan results with AI-optimized execution
        """
        data = {"target": target, "objective": objective}
    
        logger.info(f"🚀 Executing smart scan for {target} with {objective} objective")
        result = api_client.safe_post("api/intelligence/smart-scan", data)
    
        if result.get("success"):
            logger.info(f"✅ Smart scan completed for {target}")
        else:
            logger.error(f"❌ Smart scan failed for {target}")
    
        return result
  • Registration of the 'smart_scan' tool using FastMCP @mcp.tool() decorator.
    def smart_scan(target: str, objective: str = "comprehensive") -> dict[str, Any]:
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'AI-driven tool selection with parallel execution', which hints at automation and concurrency, but fails to disclose critical behavioral traits like required permissions, potential rate limits, whether it's destructive or safe, execution time, or output format details. For a scanning tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps in understanding its operation and risks.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded, starting with the core action and followed by Args and Returns sections. Each sentence adds value: the first explains the tool's intelligent and parallel nature, and the sections clarify inputs and outputs. There's minimal waste, though it could be slightly more concise by integrating the sections into a smoother flow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (AI-driven scanning with parallel execution), no annotations, and an output schema exists (implied by 'Returns'), the description is moderately complete. It covers the basic purpose and parameters but lacks depth in behavioral context, usage differentiation from siblings, and detailed parameter guidance. The output schema likely handles return values, so the description doesn't need to explain those, but overall it's adequate with clear gaps for a tool of this nature.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It lists 'target' and 'objective' in the Args section, adding that 'target' is a domain, IP, or URL and 'objective' has options like 'comprehensive, fast, stealth, targeted'. However, with 2 parameters, this provides basic semantics but lacks details on formats (e.g., URL syntax), constraints, or default behaviors beyond the schema's 'default: comprehensive'. It doesn't fully cover the parameters' nuances, such as what 'stealth' entails.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool 'Execute intelligent scan using AI-driven tool selection with parallel execution', which provides a general purpose (scanning with AI optimization) but is vague about what specifically is being scanned or how it differs from many sibling tools like 'nmap_scan', 'nikto_scan', or 'bugbounty_comprehensive_assessment'. It mentions 'AI-driven tool selection' but doesn't clarify the domain (e.g., network, web, security) or unique value.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. With numerous sibling tools for scanning (e.g., 'nmap_scan', 'dirsearch_scan', 'bugbounty_reconnaissance_workflow'), the description lacks context on scenarios where 'smart_scan' is preferred, such as for automated tool selection or parallel execution needs. It implies usage through the 'objective' parameter but doesn't state exclusions or comparisons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SlanyCukr/bugbounty-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server