A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceDynamically exposes any REST API as MCP tools by parsing its OpenAPI specification.
MIT
opendata-mcp
by Skeego
Related Servers
Alternatives to opendata-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes OpenAPI endpoints as MCP tools, enabling LLMs to discover and interact with REST APIs through the MCP protocol.4 npmMIT
cod-api MCP Serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes REST API endpoints defined in an OpenAPI Specification as MCP tools, allowing AI models to call them via the ModelContext Protocol.-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes REST API endpoints defined by OpenAPI specifications as MCP tools, enabling LLMs to discover and interact with those APIs through MCP.3,228 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes OpenAPI/Swagger API documentation as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to search, inspect, and call API endpoints through natural language.517 npmMIT
ForIT MCP Gatewayofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables turning selected OpenAPI operations into authenticated MCP tools with branded OAuth, operation allowlisting, and live schema refreshes.Apache 2.0
TDQS
C2.9/5.0
Scored across 99 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Many tools have distinct purposes, but there are several overlapping pairs (e.g., multiple get_user_activity, get_feed, get_related, list_versions vs list_view_versions). Descriptions help differentiate, but the sheer number of tools increases ambiguity.
Naming Consistency2/5
Tool names are highly inconsistent: some are long path-based (e.g., add_comment_v1_requests__request_id__comments_post), others are short (e.g., discover_datasets). Mix of full paths, HTTP verbs, and typical function names with no clear pattern.
Tool Count1/5
99 tools is far too many for an MCP server. The server wraps a large API, but for agent use, this overwhelms selection. Typical servers have 5-20 tools; this is extreme.
Completeness3/5
The tool set covers many areas (datasets, views, figures, requests, graph, enrichment, providers, users), but there are notable gaps (e.g., no create/delete dataset) and redundancy. It's comprehensive but not well-curated.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues