motimate_get_moti_chapters

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry behavioral information. It correctly implies a read-only operation, but it does not disclose that include_content defaults to true and controls whether heavy content blocks are loaded, nor does it provide response or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, focused sentence with no filler. It states the purpose clearly and is easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-parameter getter with full schema coverage, the description is minimally sufficient. However, there is no output schema, no mention of the content-block inclusion behavior, and no relationship to sibling tools, so some semantics must be inferred.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents both parameters fully (100% coverage). The description adds no real parameter-level semantics beyond referencing 'einer bestimmten Schulung' for moti_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the operation: returns all chapters of a specific training. It uses a specific verb and resource, but it does not mention how this differs from sibling tools like motimate_search_moti_content or motimate_get_moti_progress.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'einer bestimmten Schulung' implies the tool is used when a specific training ID is already known and its chapters are needed. There is no explicit guidance on when not to use it or which alternative to choose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.