Skip to main content
Glama
Sindhura30

Performance Analysis MCP Server

by Sindhura30
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Performance Analysis MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Lighthouse MCP

      mizchi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to perform Google Lighthouse website performance analysis, including Core Web Vitals, accessibility, SEO audits, and actionable optimization recommendations. Provides comprehensive web performance insights through natural language interactions.
      1,300 npm
      4
      MIT

    • web-performance-mcp

      teles
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web performance analysis using Google PageSpeed Insights and Chrome UX Report APIs, providing compact metrics and diagnostics without local browser automation.
      5
      4 npm
      MIT

    • LightScout MCP

      bobbyrgoldsmith
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Core Web Vitals analysis powered by Lighthouse. Four tools: analyze a URL, compare two URLs, check against thresholds, or crawl an entire site. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool.
      4
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Performance Engineer MCP

      rhamevangelista
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Analyzes websites like a senior performance engineer and produces prioritized Core Web Vitals recommendations. Provides 16 tools for detailed performance analysis, including Lighthouse, CrUX, WordPress and Cloudflare inspections.
      16
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools; the purpose is singular and clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (analyze_page), which is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server claims to be a Performance Analysis MCP Server but provides only one tool, which is too few for the implied broader scope. A single tool feels thin and under-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The server covers only basic page performance metrics. Missing tools for audits, comparisons, history, or reporting create significant gaps for a performance analysis server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources