Skip to main content
Glama
SindaBNO

eu-filings

by SindaBNO

Related Servers

Alternatives to eu-filings

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to European company data and financial filings from multiple sources including GLEIF (1.6M+ EU companies), ESEF XBRL filings (FR, DK, GB, LT, UA), UK Companies House (5M+ companies), and curated major index lists (DAX40, FTSE100, SIX).
      1
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables deep analysis of SEC EDGAR filings through universal company search, document content extraction, and advanced filing search capabilities. Provides AI-ready access to business descriptions, risk factors, financial statements, and full-text search across any public company's SEC documents.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching SEC EDGAR for companies, retrieving recent filings (e.g., 10-K, 10-Q), and accessing structured XBRL financial facts.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to UK Companies House public data, enabling search and retrieval of company profiles, officers, filing history, and more through natural language queries.
      12
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying of SEC EDGAR filings and financial data via natural language, offering tools for company lookup, filing retrieval, XBRL data, and full-text search.
      170 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's purpose is clearly described, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The single tool name 'eu-filings' is descriptive but does not follow the typical verb_noun convention seen in well-designed MCP servers. With only one tool, there is no pattern to violate, but it also fails to establish a consistent naming style.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for a server that claims to provide comprehensive access to European financial filings across 27+ countries. The domain is complex and would benefit from separate tools for specific actions like retrieving filings, searching XBRL data, or fetching financial statements.

    Completeness2/5

    The server offers only a catch-all tool, lacking granular operations for distinct tasks such as searching, filtering, or comparing financial data. This creates significant gaps because agents cannot perform specific actions without relying on a single, overloaded interface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues