eu-filings
Related Servers
Alternatives to eu-filings
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to European company data and financial filings from multiple sources including GLEIF (1.6M+ EU companies), ESEF XBRL filings (FR, DK, GB, LT, UA), UK Companies House (5M+ companies), and curated major index lists (DAX40, FTSE100, SIX).1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceCompany data for Spain, France, the UK, Ireland and Poland — registry, KYB and sanctions.189 npmMIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables deep analysis of SEC EDGAR filings through universal company search, document content extraction, and advanced filing search capabilities. Provides AI-ready access to business descriptions, risk factors, financial statements, and full-text search across any public company's SEC documents.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching SEC EDGAR for companies, retrieving recent filings (e.g., 10-K, 10-Q), and accessing structured XBRL financial facts.4 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to UK Companies House public data, enabling search and retrieval of company profiles, officers, filing history, and more through natural language queries.12-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying of SEC EDGAR filings and financial data via natural language, offering tools for company lookup, filing retrieval, XBRL data, and full-text search.170 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's purpose is clearly described, making selection unambiguous.
The single tool name 'eu-filings' is descriptive but does not follow the typical verb_noun convention seen in well-designed MCP servers. With only one tool, there is no pattern to violate, but it also fails to establish a consistent naming style.
A single tool is too few for a server that claims to provide comprehensive access to European financial filings across 27+ countries. The domain is complex and would benefit from separate tools for specific actions like retrieving filings, searching XBRL data, or fetching financial statements.
The server offers only a catch-all tool, lacking granular operations for distinct tasks such as searching, filtering, or comparing financial data. This creates significant gaps because agents cannot perform specific actions without relying on a single, overloaded interface.