Skip to main content
Glama
vibe-blueprint

vibe-blueprint

by SinboBoop

Related Servers

Alternatives to vibe-blueprint

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Guides users through a structured pre-coding workflow—classifying experience, interviewing, scoping, architecture, database schema, and roadmap—while persisting decisions and checking for drift during implementation.
      10
      12 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns a rambling app idea into a structured planning canvas of screens, flows, systems, data and open questions inside an existing Claude Code or Codex session, then writes the settled plan back to that session as a spec to build from. Plans are stored in the project's .doan/ folder alongside the code.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients and agents to turn a new idea into a structured set of clarifying questions, technology options, upward design breakdowns, reverse reasoning, and risk assessments so users can steer top-level design decisions. It also supports saving insights and building a bidirectional design tree of concepts and their implementations.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-capable IDEs to run an adaptive requirements interview, calculate capacity, and generate validated high-level and low-level design documents with diagrams from a natural-language application description.
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the Foundation workflow: health check (doctor), proposal (analyze_project), user interaction (answer_question), reading (get), writing (commit), re-evaluation (assess_change), scanning (scan_changes), and verification (verify). There is no meaningful overlap between any two tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools share the fixed prefix 'foundation_' followed by a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., analyze_project, answer_question, scan_changes). This provides a predictable and systematic naming scheme across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the set is well-scoped for the Foundation domain. Each tool serves a necessary function and none feel redundant or superfluous, fitting comfortably within the ideal 3-15 tool range.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full lifecycle: analysis, user interaction, commit, change assessment, scanning, verification, and health checks. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations for the stated purpose of managing project Foundation state.