agent-intern
Related Servers
Alternatives to agent-intern
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges CLI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, opencode, and Antigravity into any MCP client, enabling synchronous and asynchronous task execution, follow-up input, and a structured code review tool.103 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.47187 npm2Apache 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, etc.) access to multiple AI models through Antigravity CLI and OpenAI Codex CLI, enabling mid-conversation model consultation and code review.8-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server and HTTP gateway that dispatches coding tasks to Claude Code, Codex, and Antigravity CLI sessions, keeps track of those sessions, and optionally runs an implement → review → verify loop against a real repository.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that bridges Claude with KiloCode, enabling Claude to act as architect and delegate coding tasks to Kilo's fast CLI agent while monitoring progress and reviewing results.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude Code call the Google Antigravity CLI (agy) headlessly for a second opinion from a different model family, or to have agy read project files on Claude's behalf so large files never enter Claude's context window.39 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Every tool is namespaced by backend and action (ask/continue/status), so the 7-provider matrix is immediately clear. The swarm and image variants are also distinct: single vs. parallel, text vs. image. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
All tools follow a consistent lowercase snake_case pattern with a backend prefix and a predictable action verb: ask, continue, or status. Even the swarm/image tools fit the broader convention, making the naming scheme easy to infer.
24 tools is on the heavy side and falls in the 16-25 borderline range. However, the count is systematic: 7 backends × 3 core operations plus a few genuinely additive swarm/image tools, so the size is justifiable even if it feels large.
The core lifecycle for each backend is covered well: new session (ask), resume (continue), and diagnostics/status. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit cancel/list-session operations and image/swarm support only for Antigravity, but these are workable and the main workflows are complete.