start_lsp
Start a specific LSP server by name to enable code analysis, diagnostics, and autocompletion features in your editor.
Instructions
start a specific LSP server
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | LSP name |
Start a specific LSP server by name to enable code analysis, diagnostics, and autocompletion features in your editor.
start a specific LSP server
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | LSP name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'start' with no details on side effects, permissions, or error states. This is insufficient for an action tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short and front-loaded, but it lacks important details. It earns its place but could be expanded without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description does not cover behavioral context like return values, error handling, or prerequisites. It is insufficient for a tool with no other documentation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's 'LSP name' description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'start' and resource 'LSP server', distinguishing it from siblings like restart_lsp or get_lsp. However, 'specific' is vague and could be more explicit.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like restart_lsp or when prerequisites are needed. The description lacks usage context entirely.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Simonoob/neovim-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server