tone-listener-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tone-listener-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local AI agents to control a Fender Mustang GT40 through Fender Tone on Android, capture and compare USB recordings, and perform validated, bounded tone refinements without paid AI APIs.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to analyze audio files through numerical fingerprints, pitch tracking, and visual spectrograms without requiring direct audio playback. It provides tools for comparing audio iterations and detecting patterns using token-efficient analysis operations.14-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to analyze audio files, extracting tempo, key, beat drops, volume surges, high tones, loudness, brightness, and structure, and returning structured JSON and visualizations.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to shape BOSS KATANA Gen 3 amplifier tones from natural-language descriptions, moving the knobs live inside BOSS TONE STUDIO over USB. Agents can read the current patch, set amp and effect parameters in one call, and let changes play through the amp instantly.68MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to check whether generated audio matches a prompt in any language, rank takes, run technical QC, judge fit against images or video, and search or dedupe a local sound library. Each tool returns the same JSON records as the matching CLI command, with the model loaded once and everything running locally.38 PyPI16MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to read, patch, and render DAW projects (REAPER, FL Studio, .rpp/.dawproject) and to measure WAV audio metrics such as peak, RMS, LUFS, and stereo width. It closes the loop by applying patches, rendering before/after audio, and scoring the results against an intent so music-production models can be trained and verified.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
audio_metrics and analyze_audio both measure audio levels/spectrum and differ mainly by an optional Gemini upload step, which makes misselection likely. compare_audio and server_info are clearly distinct, so overlap is limited to one ambiguous pair.
Names are readable but follow mixed conventions: two noun-style names (server_info, audio_metrics) and two verb_noun names (analyze_audio, compare_audio). No camelCase chaos, but there is no single predictable pattern for an agent to rely on.
Four tools is a tight, focused surface for an audio-analysis server, and each tool maps to a plausible workflow. server_info is arguably filler, keeping it from a 5.
The surface covers measurement, single-clip analysis, and A/B comparison, but there is no tool for recording, streaming/live monitoring, or device/input selection despite the 'listener' framing. Agents would hit a dead end on any real-time or capture workflow.