Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to PhantomHand

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight 30KB MCP browser automation server that uses raw Chrome DevTools Protocol to enable AI agents to browse the web, take screenshots, interact with elements, and capture live page events like console logs and network requests.
      26
      220 npm
      16
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Universal MCP server that enables any LLM agent (Claude, Cursor, Cline) to control a real Chrome browser with 5 perception engines, resilient heartbeat, and real-time vision streaming.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      single-binary MCP server that gives AI agents a browser. 66 tools for navigation, form filling, data extraction, screenshots, and DOM diffing — built on pure Chrome DevTools Protocol.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets LLM agents control all Chrome browser tabs via accessibility snapshots, element references, and a virtual cursor, supporting operations like click, type, navigate, screenshot, and video recording.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each browser automation tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with different click types, input methods, and navigation actions that are well-described and non-overlapping. Even similar actions like browser_type and browser_set_value are differentiated by how they interact with elements.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow the consistent pattern of 'browser_' prefix with snake_case verb_noun names (e.g., browser_click, browser_navigate). The only exception is 'get_extension_info' which lacks the prefix, breaking the pattern slightly.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 41 tools, the server covers a very broad scope of browser interactions. While each tool is justified, the count is on the high end and could potentially be reduced by combining some related actions into more parameterized tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers nearly all common browser automation scenarios including navigation, clicking, typing, scrolling, tab management, clipboard, sessions, and file operations. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for extracting structured page data beyond raw text/HTML.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues