Skip to main content
Glama
SignalEDI

SignalEDI MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to SignalEDI MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Let AI agents read, validate and acknowledge EDI documents. Parses raw X12 and EDIFACT interchanges into structured JSON, validates envelope integrity, produces plain-language summaries, and generates 997 Functional Acknowledgments.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage QuickBooks Online data through natural language, including customers, invoices, bills, vendors, accounts, and financial reports.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      InvoiceXML brings e-invoice compliance to your AI agent. Create, validate, convert, render, and extract structured invoices across UBL (Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, used worldwide), CII, Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, and XRechnung, all checked against the EN 16931 standard and official Schematron rules. Ask your assistant to generate a compliant invoice, validate one for errors, or convert between formats, with n
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Validates EU electronic invoices (Peppol, XRechnung, FatturaPA, etc.) and explains validation error codes, enabling AI coding agents to check invoice validity and get fixes before rejection.
      3
      53
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to QuickBooks Online, enabling management of invoices, customers, expenses, and reports through natural language.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Three pairs of tools are explicit aliases (validate_edi/validate_x12_structure, parse_edi/parse_segments, lookup_x12/lookup_element_definition), creating redundant duplicates that an agent cannot easily distinguish. Additionally, parse_edi and validate_edi have closely related purposes, further blurring boundaries. This makes tool selection ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., parse_edi, get_transaction), but the aliases break consistency by introducing different names for the same operation. The quickbooks_ prefix is used only for a subset of tools, creating a mixed prefix convention. Overall, the pattern is readable but not perfectly predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, the count is slightly above the ideal range, and three redundant aliases inflate the number without adding functionality. The core set of 15 unique tools is reasonable for the server's scope, covering EDI operations, QuickBooks sync, and reference lookups.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the main EDI lifecycle (parse, validate, send, track) and QuickBooks integration (status, sync, export, list, disconnect), which are the core workflows. Missing partner management and inbound acknowledgement handling are minor gaps that can be worked around via existing tools or webhooks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing