sigmodx_log_anomaly_decision

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds behavioral context about automatic escalation for critical severity, which is not in annotations (none provided). However, misses other behavioral traits like idempotency, auth requirements, or side effects. Moderate disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words, but could include brief parameter guidance without bloating. Efficient overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 9 parameters (including nested 'inputs'), no output schema, and no annotations, this description is insufficient. Missing explanation of key parameters, expected input format, and return behavior. Leaves significant gaps for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate but only mentions the decision_type actions (flag, clear, escalate) implicitly. Does not explain other parameters like 'inputs', 'rationale', or enum values. Minimal added value over schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'log', resource 'anomaly detection decision', and context 'financial transaction'. Differentiates from siblings by specifying anomaly-specific actions (flag, clear, escalate).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: 'when an AI agent flags, clears, or escalates a financial transaction anomaly.' Provides behavioral note about automatic escalation for critical severity, but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.