interactive-choice-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOICE_LANG | No | Interface language (en, zh) | Auto-detected by system language |
| CHOICE_LOG_FILE | No | Log file path (optional) | |
| CHOICE_WEB_HOST | No | Web server host | 127.0.0.1 |
| CHOICE_WEB_PORT | No | Web server port | 9999 |
| CHOICE_LOG_LEVEL | No | Log level (DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR) | INFO |
| CHOICE_MCP_DATA_DIR | No | Data storage directory | .mcp-data/ |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| provide_choiceA | Use this tool to resolve ambiguities, confirm high-risk actions, or validate task completion. |
| poll_selectionC | Polls for the result of an ongoing interaction session that was switched from Terminal to Web. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools—poll_selection and provide_choice—have clearly distinct purposes: one presents choices to the user, the other retrieves results after a web switch. There is no overlap.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: 'poll_selection' and 'provide_choice', which is clear and predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for its stated purpose of interactive choices. While the existing tools are comprehensive, the set lacks additional tools for cancellation or session management, making it borderline.
The tool set covers the core flow of presenting choices and polling results, but is missing a cancellation or abort mechanism, which is a minor gap for an interactive system.