Skip to main content
Glama
SiftingIO

siftingio-mcp

Official

Economic calendar

economic_calendar_list
Read-only

Fetch upcoming and released macroeconomic events with actual, previous, and consensus values. Filter by date, country, impact, agency, or event ID.

Instructions

Upcoming and released macro economic events (actual/previous/consensus).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fromNoLower bound, YYYY-MM-DD or RFC3339. Default: now.
toNoUpper bound, YYYY-MM-DD or RFC3339. Default: from + 30 days.
countryNoTwo-letter country code. Default: US.
impactNoImpact level: low, medium, high.
agencyNoIssuing agency: BLS, BEA, Census, Fed, DOL, EIA.
event_idNoFilter to a single recurring event, e.g. us_cpi.
limitNo1-500. Default 100.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey readOnlyHint and openWorldHint. Description adds context about data nature (upcoming and released events with values), but doesn't clarify historical depth or pagination. Still, it's reasonably transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with key concept 'macro economic events' and includes data fields in parentheses.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description plus annotations provide a good understanding. It could mention default parameter behaviors briefly, but given the tool's simplicity, it is nearly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-described in the schema. The tool description provides no additional meaning beyond the schema, earning baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it lists macro economic events with actual/previous/consensus values. The specificity of 'macro economic events' distinguishes it from siblings like markets_calendar, which likely covers market schedule events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives like markets_calendar. The description implies it's for macro data but lacks exclusionary or contextual hints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SiftingIO/siftingio-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server