Skip to main content
Glama
Siemssen-Consulting-GmbH

mcp-easycompliance

Official
by Siemssen-Consulting-GmbH
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-easycompliance

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Aml Ai MCP

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AML/6AMLD compliance for AI systems, including obliged entity classification, KYC/CDD audits, and sanctions screening.
      MIT

    • @oilflow/mcp-server

      rafaemush
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to screen counterparties against government sanctions lists and fraud-cluster registries, check regulatory tradability across 235 jurisdictions, and run pre-deal compliance checks via OilFlow APIs, with three tools usable without an API key.
      13
      13 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • @deepidv/mcp-server by Deep-Identity-Inc

      @deepidv/mcp-serverofficial

      Deep-Identity-Inc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform identity verification, KYC/KYB, PEP & sanctions screening, bank statement analysis, and workflow automation via the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT

    • opensanctions-mcp

      scka-de
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for sanctions screening and PEP checks via OpenSanctions API. Search entities, match against 320+ sanctions lists, and run compound compliance investigations with AI agents.
      6
      30 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct function: one-time checks for sanctions and PEP, monitoring addition/removal, retrieving monitoring hits, and list status. No overlapping purposes; check_and_add_to_monitoring is clearly differentiated from the one-time checks by its persistent side effect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (check_*, get_*, remove_*, check_and_add_to_monitoring). The naming conventions are uniform and predictable, making it easy to infer tool behavior from the name.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped count for a compliance screening server. Each tool addresses a necessary part of the core workflow without unnecessary bloat or missing essentials.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the complete lifecycle: one-time screening for both sanctions and PEP lists, adding to ongoing monitoring, retrieving monitoring hits, removing monitoring entries, and checking list freshness. No obvious gaps that would hinder an agent from performing compliance screening tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources