bearer-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to bearer-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA mock MCP server for testing MCP client implementations and development workflows. Supports tools, prompts, and resources across multiple transport protocols (stdio, HTTP, SSE).1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA minimal local HTTP MCP mock server for development and testing, providing predictable tool responses with OAuth token support and zero dependencies.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA minimal MCP server exposed over HTTP with bearer token authentication, providing echo and get_server_time tools to demonstrate transport and auth mechanics.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server with HTTP/stdio support, a web admin panel for managing services, capabilities, and user permissions with Bearer token authentication, enabling relay and access control for MCP tools.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server provides a Streamable HTTP endpoint with bearer token authentication, exposing echo and add tools, and an info resource for remote client integration.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables deployment and connection to a minimal Streamable HTTP MCP server with bearer-token authentication, a health endpoint, and an example tool, while allowing developers to add custom tools.-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: projects (create, get, search), deployments, API keys (list, rotate), metrics, logs, diagnostics, and connectivity. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_project, search_logs, rotate_api_key). The only deviation is 'echo', which lacks a noun object, but this is a minor utility and does not undermine the overall pattern.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for a platform management API. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of project and deployment management, observability, and diagnostics, without unnecessary bloat.
The server covers project creation, retrieval, search, and deployment, but lacks update/delete operations for projects and API key creation/deletion. Deployment status tracking is also missing. These are notable gaps that agents may need to work around.