Skip to main content
Glama
Shylendra

bearer-mcp-server

by Shylendra

Related Servers

Alternatives to bearer-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A mock MCP server for testing MCP client implementations and development workflows. Supports tools, prompts, and resources across multiple transport protocols (stdio, HTTP, SSE).
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A minimal local HTTP MCP mock server for development and testing, providing predictable tool responses with OAuth token support and zero dependencies.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server exposed over HTTP with bearer token authentication, providing echo and get_server_time tools to demonstrate transport and auth mechanics.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server with HTTP/stdio support, a web admin panel for managing services, capabilities, and user permissions with Bearer token authentication, enabling relay and access control for MCP tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides a Streamable HTTP endpoint with bearer token authentication, exposing echo and add tools, and an info resource for remote client integration.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: projects (create, get, search), deployments, API keys (list, rotate), metrics, logs, diagnostics, and connectivity. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_project, search_logs, rotate_api_key). The only deviation is 'echo', which lacks a noun object, but this is a minor utility and does not undermine the overall pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for a platform management API. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of project and deployment management, observability, and diagnostics, without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers project creation, retrieval, search, and deployment, but lacks update/delete operations for projects and API key creation/deletion. Deployment status tracking is also missing. These are notable gaps that agents may need to work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues