olvm-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to olvm-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables management of oVirt / Red Hat Virtualization environments via AI assistants, supporting VM lifecycle, power operations, snapshots, and infrastructure queries.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides read-only, governance-audited operations for OLVM and oVirt 4.5 engines, enabling inventory, health, capacity, and diagnosis queries over MCP and CLI with audit logging and budget guards.17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables read-only interaction with Proxmox homelab VMs and containers, allowing LLM agents to list VMs, monitor status and performance metrics, view snapshots, and check cluster health through natural language queries.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to inspect and manage OpenStack clouds, including listing instances, checking quotas, and retrieving console logs. It supports opt-in write operations for creating and deleting servers, with a read-only default.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with direct access to Red Hat OpenShift AI observability data, enabling querying of Prometheus metrics, Alertmanager alerts, Loki logs, Grafana dashboards, and Kubernetes cluster state to troubleshoot vLLM inference workloads.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage HPE OneView infrastructure through the REST API, including server hardware operations, power control, profile management, and network/storage configuration.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list_vms and list_hosts enumerate different resources, and get_vm provides single-VM detail. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_vms, get_vm, list_hosts), with plural nouns for list operations and singular for the detail operation, which is idiomatic and predictable.
Three tools is borderline thin for an oVirt virtualization server; it covers only basic VM and host inventory, leaving little room for the broader management surface the domain implies. A read-only inventory intent could justify this, but it feels underpowered.
The surface only supports listing VMs, getting one VM, and listing hosts. It lacks VM lifecycle actions (start/stop/reboot), host detail or operations, cluster and storage domain queries, and create/update/delete operations, which are significant gaps for an oVirt management server.